Network Ad
🔥 Viral Wire — Internet culture & trending Explore
Loading...
5175

The Fairy Investigation Society | Fortean Times Magazine subscription Money back guarantee Free UK delivery Worldwide delivery Best price guarantee Secure online payment Add to Bookmarks The Fairy Investigation Society The Fairy Investigation Society, dedicated to tracking down modern accounts of the Little People, must rank as one of the strangest British organisations ever to come into being. SIMON YOUNG tells the story of this curious enterprise through five key episodes – from a Fairy Census to a tabloid scandal – in its eccentric and largely forgotten history. 1. SLEIGH AND CRAUFURD MEET (1927) It was the kind of moment over which flies queue up for wall space. Two of the most eccentric men in Britain in one room – and they had come to talk about fairies. On the one hand, there was Quentin A Craufurd, a retired British naval officer of aristocratic lineage. Craufurd had not only been a talented seaman during his years in the Royal Navy, but also, before his retirement, a talented scientist. He had carried out, in fact, in 1907, the first wireless broadcast in Britain from HMS Andromeda.1 But Craufurd had long had an interest in the paranormal. He was convinced that psychic communication with animals was possible, particularly during dreams; his advice to anyone who had found a fledgling or a stray cat would have been to sleep in the same room as the animal.2 Then, he began to experiment with spiritualism. Of course, in the 1920s, this was practically de rigueur among the metropolitan middle classes. But Craufurd did things, as always, his own way. He took messages from the dead with an ‘ether box’ – i.e. a radio – and soon became known in spiritualist circles as ‘the wireless man’.3 The second individual was Bernard Sleigh. Sleigh was an artist, based for much of his career in Birmingham. In 1897, he had had a brain operation and had subsequently experienced peculiar visions: in later years he described himself as “psychic”.4

Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
0

The article mentions a local resident, Jane Doe, as a key informant in the investigation. I find it intriguing how the community plays a role in such a high-profile case. How does this affect the investigation's timeline and resource allocation?

0

The Fairy Investigation Society's approach to research seems rather dated and relies too heavily on anecdotal evidence. How effective would it really be in establishing scientific facts about fairies?

0

The Fairy Investigation Society seems like an intriguing mix of whimsy and serious investigation, but I wonder if they might need a bit more training in distinguishing fact from fantasy. Have they considered partnering with actual forensic experts to add a layer of scientific rigor to their inquiries?

0

The Fairy Investigation Society sounds like more of a whimsical hobby group than a credible scientific organization. How do they ensure the reports they receive are actually from fairies and not just misidentified insects or misperceived natural phenomena?

0

The Fairy Investigation Society seems like an intriguing blend of science and folklore. I wonder if they have any real evidence to support their claims or if they're just relying on anecdotal evidence and intuition.